Tibbitts v. Zink
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The' controversy here presented, has its origin in a deposit of money in a savings bank in trust for the plaintiff. It is alleged that the defendant John Zink has wrongfully obtained possession of this fund and converted the same.
On May 1, 1916, a deposit of $4,500 was made in the City Savings Bank of Albany, the account being opened in the names of *340“ Mrs. Catherin Zink or William Zink, her husband, payable to either or the survivor of them.” These parties were husband and wife and their only children were the plaintiff and defendant John Zink. In 1927 the father was in ill health and the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Martin v. . FunkNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Mabie v. . BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Cunningham v. . DavenportNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eredics v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Hanigan v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- In re the Estate of SlobianskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re the Estate of LuntNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- In re the Estate of RossoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.