Legal Opinion

Hanigan v. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The plaintiff has judgment determining that she is entitled to $2,833.80 now on deposit in an Albany bank. This is the balance of a deposit made by defendant’s testatrix in the •name of “Alma Babcock in trust for Lena Hanigan.” The court determined that defendant’s testatrix, by the deposit, created an irrevocable trust in favor of the plaintiff. Testatrix received the money deposited in this trust fund as survivor of her husband, it having been, at the time of his death, in the same bank in their joint names, with the right of survivorship. Apparently the plaintiff was the granddaughter of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Tibbitts v. ZinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Davlin v. Title Guarantee and Trust CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of SuterNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. In re the Estate of McCredyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. In re the Estate of SlobianskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  4. In re the Estate of LuntNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  5. In re the Estate of MillerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API