Legal Opinion

In Re Appeal From Passage of Ordinance 4354 of Altoona

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 5, 1978No. 59PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

POMEROY, Justice.

We are called upon to decide whether or not a municipality which has acquired a street by dedication may, when later it vacates the street, reserve to itself an easement for utility lines within the boundaries of the vacated street. We agree with the Commonwealth Court1 that on the facts of this case, the question must be answered in the negative.

The record discloses that in 1951 Martin Goodman purchased a tract of land located in the City of Altoona and some six years later submitted to the City Planning Commission a proposed subdivision of the property.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Blumenschein v. Pittsburgh Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Palisades Properties, Inc. v. BrunettiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Payne v. KassabSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Goodman AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. HOFFMAN v. PITTSBURGHSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Tobin v. Radnor Township Board of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of ErieDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. In Re Erie Golf CourseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Glennon v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Borough of Lehighton v. KatzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API