Legal Opinion

HOFFMAN v. PITTSBURGH

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1950No. Appeal, 42PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

The City of Pittsburgh on July 11, 1947, adopted Ordinance No. 263 of 1947 pursuant to the Act of Assembly of July 2, 1937, P.L. 2793, 53 P.S. §133Í-3. This Ordinance authorized the City to acquire a. fee simple title to Diamond Market House and the land on which it is erected, known as Diamond Square, and to sell the said property to the highest responsible bidder for private use; and steps were taken to consummate said sale. Plaintiffs filed a bill in equity to enjoin the proposed sale. The original plaintiff brought his action as a resident and taxpayer and as a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Dornan v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Commonwealth State Emp. Ret. System v. Dau. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. McSorley v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Schenck v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. State College Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Payne v. KassabSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Goodman AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. J. W. Bishop & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API