Buono v. Scalia
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court 1
843 A.2d 1120 (2004)
179 N.J. 131
Kathryn BUONO, by her Guardian ad Litem Vincent Buono and Vincent Buono Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Michael SCALIA and Lisa Scalia, Defendants, and
Alphonse Scalia, Defendant-Respondent.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 17, 2003.
Decided March 29, 2004.
Matthew R. Pomo, Kearny, argued the cause for appellants (Doyle & Brady, attorneys).
John V. Mallon, Secaucus, argued the cause for respondent (Chasan, Leyner, Bariso & Lamparello, attorneys).
2Opinion of the Court · VernieroJustice Verniero
This appeal implicates the doctrine of parental immunity articulated in Foldi v. Jeffries, 93 N.J. 533,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited22 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
- Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Falco v. PADOSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.