Legal Opinion

Buono v. Scalia

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 29, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

843 A.2d 1120 (2004)

179 N.J. 131

Kathryn BUONO, by her Guardian ad Litem Vincent Buono and Vincent Buono Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Michael SCALIA and Lisa Scalia, Defendants, and

Alphonse Scalia, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 17, 2003.

Decided March 29, 2004.

Matthew R. Pomo, Kearny, argued the cause for appellants (Doyle & Brady, attorneys).

John V. Mallon, Secaucus, argued the cause for respondent (Chasan, Leyner, Bariso & Lamparello, attorneys).

2Opinion of the Court · VernieroJustice Verniero

This appeal implicates the doctrine of parental immunity articulated in Foldi v. Jeffries, 93 N.J. 533,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Falco v. PADOSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API