Martin v. Union Products, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ERWIN, Justice.
As the result of a fire which substantially damaged the home of Mr. and Mrs. Martin, we are presented with questions pertaining to the instructions on the degree of negligence and the doctrine of last clear chance.
In the summer of 1969, plaintiff-appellants Edward and Doris Martin constructed a home in the hills north of Fairbanks. They did a substantial portion of the work *401themselves, utilizing high quality materials and very sound construction techniques. A fire closet was installed on the upper floor, with a hose which could reach all rooms. The cost of the house…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kaatz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- National Bank of Alaska v. McHughAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Patterson v. CushmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Silva v. OishiHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000