Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2000No. S-8827PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Dan Smith suffered permanent injuries after an air compressor door fell on his head. He brought a strict products Hability lawsuit in federal district court against Ingersoll Rand Company, the manufacturer of the air compressor. Following three jury trials and a remand from the Ninth Circuit, the United States District Court for the District of Alaska, Singleton, J., certified the following questions to this court:(1) Did the 1986 Tort Reform Act change the existing law on comparative fault in products liability cases such that a plaintiff's…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Kaatz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. BeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Winschel v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. R & Y, INC. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. JOHNS v. SUZUKI MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  5. State of Alaska, Office of Lieutenant Governor, Division of Elections, and Director Gail Fenumiai, in an official capacity v. Alyse S. GalvinAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API