Smith v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Dan Smith suffered permanent injuries after an air compressor door fell on his head. He brought a strict products Hability lawsuit in federal district court against Ingersoll Rand Company, the manufacturer of the air compressor. Following three jury trials and a remand from the Ninth Circuit, the United States District Court for the District of Alaska, Singleton, J., certified the following questions to this court:(1) Did the 1986 Tort Reform Act change the existing law on comparative fault in products liability cases such that a plaintiff's…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Kaatz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. BeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Winschel v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- R & Y, INC. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- JOHNS v. SUZUKI MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- State of Alaska, Office of Lieutenant Governor, Division of Elections, and Director Gail Fenumiai, in an official capacity v. Alyse S. GalvinAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.