Legal Opinion

Jones v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 1995No. 0178-95PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON THE STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

A jury convicted Appellant of the offense of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment at confinement for fifteen years. On appeal the Court of Appeals reversed due to the failure to charge on a lesser included offense of robbery after the Appellant had met the test enunciated in Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666 (Tex.Cr.App.1993), and that set forth in Royster v. State, 622 S.W.2d 442 (Tex.Cr.App.1981). Jones v. State, 888 S.W.2d 869 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st], 1994). *689The State has petitioned for discretionary-review arguing that since…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Royster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Bignall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API