Bignall v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MILLER, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of aggravated robbery, Tex.Penal Code § 29.03 (Vernon 1992). The jury assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior convictions, at confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for twenty-five years. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Bignall v. State, 852 S.W.2d 682 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1993). We granted Appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that Appellant was not entitled to an instruction on theft as a…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Royster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Penagraph v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Aguilar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by624 opinions
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Ferrel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
619 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.