Legal Opinion

Neslund v. Kinnan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1935No. 29289PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

Plaintiff sued defendant on a demand note for $250. The defense was that it was an accommodation note for the benefit of plaintiff. At the conclusion of defendant’s evidence and at the conclusion of all the evidence, plaintiff’s motions for a directed verdict in his favor were overruled. The verdict and judgment were for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The question may be decided by an inquiry as to whether there was sufficient evidence to submit as disputed evidence of fact to the jury. All conventional assignments of error are duly made by appellant.

The defendant’s son was engaged in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Swanback v. Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the WorldNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Nebraska Transfer Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leach v. TreberNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Plumbly v. Harvard State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Johnson v. HansenNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API