Legal Opinion

Bridgeford & Co. v. Meagher

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 21, 1911PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

— Affirming.

On December 21, 1908, the following contract wasi entered into between the appellant, Bridgeford & Company, and the appellee Meagher:

*480“This is to certify that the undersigned, Bridgeford' & Go., will guarantee Louis L. Meagher a steady position as foreman of our molding shop, the same position he now holds, for a term of three years or as long as he performs his duties in a successful or satisfactory manner, provided Bridgeford & Co. are in existence, at a salary of not less than Twenty-two and. 50-100 Dollarsi ($22.50) per week, payable weekly,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Hamilton v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OffuttCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  5. Koehler v. BuhlMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Putnam v. Producers' Live Stock Marketing Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Louisville Tobacco Warehouse Co. v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Nave v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Frankfort & Cincinnati Railway Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Louisville N. R. Co. v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API