Legal Opinion
Bridgeford & Co. v. Meagher
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided September 21, 1911PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Carroll
— Affirming.
On December 21, 1908, the following contract wasi entered into between the appellant, Bridgeford & Company, and the appellee Meagher:
*480“This is to certify that the undersigned, Bridgeford' & Go., will guarantee Louis L. Meagher a steady position as foreman of our molding shop, the same position he now holds, for a term of three years or as long as he performs his duties in a successful or satisfactory manner, provided Bridgeford & Co. are in existence, at a salary of not less than Twenty-two and. 50-100 Dollarsi ($22.50) per week, payable weekly,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Hamilton v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OffuttCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
- Koehler v. BuhlMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Putnam v. Producers' Live Stock Marketing Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Louisville Tobacco Warehouse Co. v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Nave v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Frankfort & Cincinnati Railway Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.