Legal Opinion

Hill v. Bartels

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 19, 2002No. AC 22276PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiff, Luba Hill, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after it granted the motion for a nonsuit filed by the defendants, Philip Bartels, the law firm of Holland, Kaufmann and Bartels, and the law firm of Duel and Holland. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) granted the defendants’ motion for a nonsuit and (2) overruled her objection to the granting of the motion. We decline to review the plaintiffs claims.

The defendants represented the plaintiff in her divorce proceedings from June, 1992, through January, 1993, when the plaintiff terminated the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wren v. MacPherson Interiors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Baris v. Southbend, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DavilaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. State v. LinarteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API