Legal Opinion
Redding v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 6, 1994No. 72024, 73702PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Justice:
Certiorari has been granted in these companion eases to address the following issues: (1) Whether the State of Oklahoma is exempt under the Governmental Tort Claims Act, 51 O.S.Supp.1987, § 155(23) from tort liability for claims involving medical care and attention furnished to a prisoner by physicians employed by the Department of Corrections, and (2) Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding the provisions of the Governmental Tort Claims Act conflict with 57 O.S.1981 § 553 and repeal that section by implication.
The facts of both cases center on serious injuries suffered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Sand Springs v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Nguyen v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Medina v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Neal v. DonahueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Nichols v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Salazar v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- McMinn v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. CMS Continental Natural Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- RIDINGS v. MAZESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Gooding v. KetcherDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.