Legal Opinion

Ammons v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 30, 1924No. A-4687PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatson, P. J.

(after stating the facts as above). After an examination of the record, the conclusion is reached that the confession of error of the Attorney General should be sustained.

While it is not necessary for the trial court to instruct on some theory of the law not supported by the evidence (Newby v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 291, 188 P. 124), it is nevertheless incumbent on the trial court to give, and the defendant has a right to have, when requested, an affirmative instruction to the jury applicable to his testimony, based upon the hypothesis that it is true, when such testimony affects a material…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Newby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Crittenden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Peyton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roberson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Linde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Heath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Roberson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API