Ammons v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtMatson, P. J.
(after stating the facts as above). After an examination of the record, the conclusion is reached that the confession of error of the Attorney General should be sustained.
While it is not necessary for the trial court to instruct on some theory of the law not supported by the evidence (Newby v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 291, 188 P. 124), it is nevertheless incumbent on the trial court to give, and the defendant has a right to have, when requested, an affirmative instruction to the jury applicable to his testimony, based upon the hypothesis that it is true, when such testimony affects a material…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Newby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
- Crittenden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
- Peyton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roberson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
- Linde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
- Heath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
- Roberson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950