Legal Opinion

Heath v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 6, 1930No. A-7566PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Stephens county of the crime of grand larceny, and his punishment fixed by the jury at imprisonment in the penitentiary for one year and one day.

For the purpose of disposing, of this appeal, it will only be necessary to consider one question, viz., that the court erred in failing to give instructions requested by the defendant upon the theory of his defense based on the assumption that his testimony is true.

The evidence of the state was that the officers with a search warrant found the stolen property in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Crittenden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Ammons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Pearce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API