Padilla v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1DissentHendley, Judge
I dissent.
The authority to grant lump-sum awards in lieu of periodic payments is § 52-1-30, N.M.S.A.1978. It provides that if the court “determines in cases of total permanent disability that it is in the interest of the rehabilitation of the injured workman . . . the liability of the employer for compensation may be discharged by the payment of a lump sum .... ” As I read the statute, not only must a lump-sum award further the rehabilitation of. the workman, it must also be in his best interest. These factors must be present as a matter of law before lump-sum awards may be granted.
Although I…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Codling v. Aztec Well Servicing Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hughey v. WareNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
- Lincoln Water & Light Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
- Stell v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Claim of Snyder v. Union Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927