Legal Opinion · Dissent

Padilla v. Frito-Lay, Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1981No. 5201Published

1DissentHendley, Judge

I dissent.

The authority to grant lump-sum awards in lieu of periodic payments is § 52-1-30, N.M.S.A.1978. It provides that if the court “determines in cases of total permanent disability that it is in the interest of the rehabilitation of the injured workman . . . the liability of the employer for compensation may be discharged by the payment of a lump sum .... ” As I read the statute, not only must a lump-sum award further the rehabilitation of. the workman, it must also be in his best interest. These factors must be present as a matter of law before lump-sum awards may be granted.

Although I…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Codling v. Aztec Well Servicing Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Hughey v. WareNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Lincoln Water & Light Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Stell v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Claim of Snyder v. Union Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API