Stell v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WREN, Judge.
The question presented on this appeal is whether the Industrial Commission abused its discretion in denying petitioner’s request for commutation of compensation to a lump sum payment. We find that it did not.
On October 24, 1969, petitioner, S. W. Stell, suffered an industrial injury to his back. His claim for benefits under the Arizona Workmen’s Compensation Act was accepted by respondent insurance carrier. In June of 1971, the Commission entered an award for unscheduled permanent partial disability pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-1044(C), entitling petitioner to $160.30 per month.
I…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. PressleyArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Reed v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Laukaitis v. Sisters of Charity of LeavenworthMontana Supreme Court · 1959
- Goodrich v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rabago v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Prigosin v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Padilla v. Frito-Lay, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Padilla v. Frito-Lay, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981