In Re Estate of Harford
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
A party to a settlement agreement seeking relief on the basis of mistake must establish the legal basis for that relief under the law of contracts. The mistake must be mutual, not unilateral, as was the case here.
Married in 1955, Edith and Delbert Harford each had children from prior marriages: Edith’s children are Fred, Joy, and Louise, and Delbert’s child was Opal. In 1972, Delbert executed a will which stated that Edith and Delbert had agreed to leave their property to each other, and then, upon the survivor’s death, in equal shares to all four children. Edith signed Delbert’s will…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Haller v. WallisWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. LoewenWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Graves v. P. J. Taggares Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- Golberg v. SanglierWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Berg v. TingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bort v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Bort v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- King v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- King v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Worden v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.