Sidener v. Norristown, Hope, & St. Louis Turnpike Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Bartholomew Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtGbesoky, J.
The appellants, who were the plaintiffs below, allege by their. complaint that they are seized of a certain quarter section of land; that the turnpike company, defendant, intending to locate the route of their road on the south line of the plaintiffs’ land, so as to occupy twenty-two and a half feet in width of their land across the south end thereof, and a like quantity of the land abutting on the south, but mistaking the location of said south line, actually surveyed and staked off a route for their road, not upon the south line, but almost entirely north thereof, so as to take the whole…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davis v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Benson v. MayorNew York Supreme Court · 1850
- Corning v. LowerreNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
- Lafayette Plankroad Co. v. New Albany & Salem RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Attorney General v. Cohoes Co.New York Court of Chancery · 1836
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- City of Logansport v. UhlIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. SwinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Faust v. City of HuntingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Heagy v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.