Legal Opinion
Cramer v. Biddison
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 10, 1968No. Civ. 30864PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*723FLEMING, J.
Charlotte Cramer appeals an order dismissing her action against Evelyn Biddison and Harold Angerhofer, executors of the estate of Glen Hummer. The order followed appellant’s refusal to amend her second amended complaint after demurrers had been sustained to her pleading.
In 1959 appellant divorced Hummer. The judgment of divorce incorporated a stipulation of the parties stating in relevant part: “Defendant shall maintain insurance on his own life with death benefits of not less than $15,000.00 for each of the minor children, or a total of $45,000.00. Said insurance shall be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Noble v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Worthington v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kraus v. Willow Park Public Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Murphy v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Sandra Joanne Murphy, Plaintiff-Third Party Defendant-Appellant-Cross v. The Travelers Insurance Company, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Barbara A. Murphy, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Minors Lee S. Murphy, Etc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Calistoga Civic Club v. City of CalistogaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Getty v. GettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.