Legal Opinion

Krabbenhoft v. Wright

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 21, 1907No. Nos. 15,003-(90)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action of ejectment in the district court for Clay county. The case was tried before Baxter, J., who found-in favor-of defendant. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.

This was an action of ejectment. The answer asserted title.by adverse possession. The case was tried by the court. Upon findings of fact and conclusions of law filed, judgment was ordered for the defendant and respondent. Plaintiff took this appeal from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The facts are undisputed. Plaintiff and defendant have owned and occupied for years the east half of section 16, township 138, range 47, in .Clay county. Plaintiff owned the northeast and defendant the southeast quarter. The subject-matter of the suit is a narrow, wedge-shaped tract, lying along the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wright v. KrabbenhoftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Hacklander v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Speer v. KramerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Hodson v. HammerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API