Speer v. Kramer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action in ejectment. On motion of the plaintiff the answer was stricken as sham. The defendant appeals.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the owner of the south one-half of the • southwest quarter of section 1-116-38 in Renville county; that the defendant is the owner of the eighty to the north and the eighty to the east; and that the defendant is in possession of a strip of land along the north side of the plaintiff’s eighty 16 feet wide at the west and 25 feet on the east, a,nd of a strip along the east side 25 feet wide at the north and 4 feet wide at the south. The answer alleges…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McArthur v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Stadin v. HelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Sawbridge v. City of Fergus FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Krabbenhoft v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hacklander v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Hodson v. HammerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Miller v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960