Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. East River Bridge Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiffs, Miles M. O’Brien and James G. Cannon, 'as receivers of the Madison Square Bank, from a judgment of the Supreme' Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clel’k-of the county of New York on the 1st day of June, 1898, upon the report of a referee dismissing the complaint upon the merits.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.:

This- action was brought by the receivers of the Madison. Square Bank to recover from the defendant a sum of money to which they claimed they- were entitled under the provisions of section 48 of the Stock Corporation Law (Laws of 1890, chap. 564, as .amended by •Laws of 1892, chap. 688), which reads as follows : “No corporation which shall have refused to pay any of its notes or other -obligations when due in lawful money of the United States, nor any of its officers or directors, shall transfer any of its property to any of its officers, ■ directors or stockholders, directly or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hirshfeld v. BoppAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Throop v. Hatch Lithographic Co.New York Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Caesar v. BernardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. Trustees of Masonic Hall & Asylum Fund v. FontanaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
  3. Lodi Chemical Co. v. National Lead Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. Caesar v. BernardAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
  5. Caesar v. BernardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API