Legal Opinion

Pintacuda v. Zuckeberg

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 2003No. COA02-905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Plaintiffs Jay T. Pintacuda and his wife Lucretia Pintacuda appeal from the superior court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Mr. Pintacuda was severely injured when defendant abruptly stopped his car on an interstate highway and Mr. Pintacuda’s motorcycle skidded as he attempted to avoid colliding with defendant’s car. Defendant contends that no genuine issue of material fact exists as to the issues of proximate cause and contributory negligence and that the trial court therefore properly granted summary judgment. After reviewing the record, we conclude…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Marcus Bros. Textiles, Inc. v. Price Waterhouse, LLPSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. McNair v. BoyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pintacuda v. ZuckebergCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. RIEPER v. PearceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API