Legal Opinion

In re Carl G.

New York City Family Court

Decided May 14, 1974PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichard J. Daronco, J.

Each of the above-entitled proceedings involves an application for an order of the Family Court for the special educational needs of a physically handicapped child under section 232 (subd. [a], par. [1]) of the Family Court Act.

At the outset it is noted that no statement has been made to the court by any party in each of the above-entitled proceedings other than the allegation that each infant is a “ physically handicapped child” (Family Ct. Act, § 232, subd. [c]; Education Law, § 4401). It is further noted that in each of the above-*454entitled proceedings written indication has been received…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re DaberNew York City Family Court · 1972
  2. In re James B.New York City Family Court · 1973
  3. Reed v. ReedNew York City Family Court · 1970

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re J. J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. In re Lee E. B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. In re SharkeyNew York City Family Court · 1975
  4. Matter of JJDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Robert B. v. StateNew York City Family Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API