Degarmo v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION NORA DEGARMO, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12–cv–07578 C. R. BARD, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment) Pending before the court is the Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 18] filed by defendant C. R. Bard, Inc. (“Bard”). The plaintiff has responded [ECF No. 22], and Bard has replied [ECF No. 23]. Thus, the Motion is ripe for adjudication. As set forth below, the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. Background This action…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anthony Dash v. Floyd Mayweather, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Morgan v. Biro Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.