In re Midway Pro Bowl Relocation Benefits Claim
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
HALBROOKS, Judge *9In this certiorari appeal, relator Bowl-Rite, Inc., d/b/a Midway Pro Bowl, seeks review of a January 18, 2019 order issued by an administrative law judge (ALJ) that affirmed the City of St. Paul's denial of relator's claim for relocation benefits under MURA. Relator's claim arose from the early termination of relator's lease of a bowling alley due to the construction of a soccer stadium and related infrastructure in St. Paul.
The city denied relator's claim for relocation benefits on the ground that a private party, rather than the city, acquired the property at issue. On…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLISSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Minneapolis Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Heideman v. Metropolitan Airports CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re Relocation Benefits of James Bros. Furniture, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- In re the Risk Level Determination of J.M.T.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.