Legal Opinion

Abbot v. Peter

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1943No. 6529Published

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Chief Justice.

Suit to rescind a contract and recover the consideration paid. The trial court found that the contract was entered into “under a mutual mistake of fact — and that due to said mistake of fact there was a complete failure of consideration, and that the money paid by the plaintiff to the defendant was received by the defendant without any consideration whatsoever,” Judgment was entered for $1,000 in favor of the plaintiff and the defendant appealed.

The defendant, Charles Peter, entered into a contract with the plaintiff, S. L. Abbot, under the terms of which the plaintiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gruber v. BakerNevada Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Taylor v. OsbornWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Ingalls v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Quackenbush v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Eames v. Armstrong.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API