Abbot v. Peter
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Chief Justice.
Suit to rescind a contract and recover the consideration paid. The trial court found that the contract was entered into “under a mutual mistake of fact — and that due to said mistake of fact there was a complete failure of consideration, and that the money paid by the plaintiff to the defendant was received by the defendant without any consideration whatsoever,” Judgment was entered for $1,000 in favor of the plaintiff and the defendant appealed.
The defendant, Charles Peter, entered into a contract with the plaintiff, S. L. Abbot, under the terms of which the plaintiff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gruber v. BakerNevada Supreme Court · 1890
- Taylor v. OsbornWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Ingalls v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Quackenbush v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
- Eames v. Armstrong.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.