Legal Opinion

Ingalls v. Eaton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1872PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Sfc. Clair Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

In this case the plaintiff sues on a covenant of seisin contained in a conveyance of lands made to him by the defendant. The breach is assigned in general terms, not pointing out any specific defect. The plea, as required by our practice, is the statutory genei*al issue. On the trial the plaintiff put his deed in evidence, and then rested. The defendant put in no proof, and the circuit judge held that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. This ruling is all that is before us for review. »

It is insisted for the plaintiff that, in an action on a covenant of seisin, when the covenant is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marston v. HobbsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  2. Sedgwick v. HollenbackNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  3. Abbott v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1817
  4. Mecklem v. BlakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Snevily v. EgleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Woolley v. . NewcombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Milligan v. Sligh Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Osburn v. LovellMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Eames v. Armstrong.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Hamilton v. ShoaffIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API