Jones v. Blocker
Supreme Court of Georgia
Servants. Before Judge Harrell. Clay Superior Court. March Term, 1871. The facts are in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Warner, Judge.
The plaintiffs brought an action against the defendants to recover damages for persuading, enticing and procuring one William Powell to leave their employment. The plaintiffs allege, in their declaration, that on the 5th day of January, 1871, they entered into a contract, for a valid and legal consideration, with Powell, to work for them on their farm in *332Early county, for the year 1871; that subsequently to the making of said contract, the defendants maliciously persuaded, enticed, procured, and caused the said Powell to break his contract with plaintiffs, leave their…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Nasco, Inc. v. GimbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Rogers v. EvartsNew York Supreme Court · 1891
- Harrison v. Sarah Coventry, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Lally v. CantwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
- Patterson Glass Co. v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.