Legal Opinion
Patterson Glass Co. v. Thomas
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 12, 1919No. Civ. No. 1971PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
A general demurrer to the amended complaint of plaintiff was sustained, plaintiff was given leave to file a second amended complaint, and, upon its failure so to do, judgment of dismissal was entered, from which judgment plaintiff prosecutes this appeal upon the judgment-roll. 1
The sole question presented for decision is: Does !the * amended complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a | cause of action ?
The complaint alleges: That plaintiff is a California corporation doing business at the city of Stockton, in San Joaquin County, being engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Pierce v. Stablemen's Local 8760California Supreme Court · 1909
- Haskins v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bentley v. MountainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Piekenbrock v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- In re RabbDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1927
- PRIDE Industries v. VersAbility Resources, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023