Legal Opinion
Trout v. Carleson
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 19, 1974No. Civ. 12687PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHELAN, J.
In this case there are cross-appeals. Plaintiff Lester B. Trout appeals from an order granting him attorney fees because the amount is less than his attorney requested. The appeal of defendant Robert B. Carle son, Director of the California State Department of Social Welfare (the Director), is based upon his claim no fees should have been allowed.
Trout, in Imperial County, had filed a petition for aid as a needy disabled person, under the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code sections 13500 to 13701, to commence on October 1, 1970. After a hearing, he was found to have…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. HillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- City of Los Angeles v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Estate of StrausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Tripp v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Mandel v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Horn v. SwoapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.