Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Village of Ridgefield Park
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 21, 1999No. 98-6357UnknownCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
The primary issue raised on this appeal is an unusual question of statutory interpretation: does a municipality violate the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (“the Act” or “FLSA”) when it complies with its employees’ request that their overtime compensation be accumulated and payment deferred for as much as six weeks after their regular pay. The plaintiff, Albert J. Brooks, a K-9 police officer of the Village of Ridgefield Park (the Village), filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on his…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Albert J. Brooks v. Village Of Ridgefield ParkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- BLAN v. CLASSIC LIMOUSINE TRANSPORTATION, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021