Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Binance Holdings Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 26, 2020No. 3:20-cv-02117Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STEVEN CODY REYNOLDS, Case No. 20-cv-02117-JSC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS 9 v. AND MOTION TO STAY 10 BINANCE HOLDINGS LTD., Re: Dkt. Nos. 20 & 21 Defendant. 11 12 Steven Cody Reynolds brings claims of conversion, unjust enrichment, and negligence 13 against Binance Holdings Limited alleging Binance unlawfully seized and confiscated his property 14 in the form of cryptocurrency.1 Binance moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule 15 of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.