Legal Opinion

Nasser Beydoun v. Wataniya Restaurants Holding

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 19, 2014No. 13-2437PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs sued plaintiff Nasser Beydoun’s former employer, Qatari-based Wataniya Restaurants Holding — along with Wataniya shareholders and members of the Wataniya board of directors — in federal district court in Michigan, alleging various causes of action based on events that took place after Beydoun’s employment as Wataniya’s CEO ended contentiously. The district court dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. Because plaintiffs have failed to establish that their alleged causes of action proximately resulted from Wataniya’s contacts…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  5. O'CONNOR v. Sandy Lane Hotel Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. Kevin Malone v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. SFS Check, LLC v. First Bank of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. Johansen v. HomeAdvisor, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
  4. Cunningham v. Rapid Response Monitoring Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
  5. Triple Up Limited v. Youku Tudou Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API