Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Leo C. Hofman

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 1, 1958No. Patent Appeal 6359Published

1Opinion of the Court

258 F.2d 953

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Appellant,

v.

Leo C. HOFMAN, Appellee.

Patent Appeal No. 6359.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

May 29, 1958.

Rehearing Denied October 1, 1958.

Frank H. Marks, Chicago, Ill. (Ivan P. Tashof, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Leo C. Hofman, pro se.

Before JOHNSON, Chief Judge, and O'CONNELL, WORLEY, RICH and JACKSON (retired), Judges.

WORLEY, Judge.

1

This is an appeal from the decision of the Assistant Commissioner of Patents, acting for the Commissioner, reversing the decision of the Examiner of Interferences, and holding appellee entitled…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lauritzen & Company, Inc. v. The Borden CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. In Re Riverbank Canning Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  3. Smith v. Tobacco By-Products & Chemical Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  4. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Leo C. HofmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  5. Weyenberg Shoe Mfg. Co. v. Hood Rubber Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API