Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 2, 2006No. 2004AP2468PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeininger, J.

¶ 1. River City Refuse Removal, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc., appeals a circuit court order that reversed a Tax Appeals Commission ruling and order. The Tax Appeals Commission concluded that certain transfers of fixed assets from other Browning-Ferris subsidiaries to River City Refuse were not subject to use tax because: (1) the transferring subsidiaries lacked "mercantile intent" and were therefore not "retailers" for use tax purposes; and (2) the transfers were not made "for consideration," as is required before use tax may be imposed on a transfer.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kollasch v. AdamanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Menasha Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Feldman v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Menasha Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  5. Alta V Limited Partnership, Transferee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API