Kohler v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*206OPINION OF THE COURT
Casey, J.
At issue on this appeal is whether article 29-H of the General Business Law should be construed as implicitly creating a private cause of action in favor of individuals affected by a breach of its provisions, and, if so, whether plaintiff’s complaint states such a cause of action. We hold that, assuming article 29-H creates a private right of action, plaintiff’s complaint fails to state such a cause of action and, therefore, we decline to pass on the first issue.
Plaintiff purchased an automobile pursuant to a retail installment contract which was assigned to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bankers Trust Co. v. J. V. Dowler & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Abounader v. Strohmeyer & Arpe Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Long v. Beneficial Finance Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- S. M. Flickinger Co. v. 18 Genesee Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Herald Square Fabrics Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jordan v. Kent Recovery Services, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1990
- James v. Ford Motor Credit Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- In the Matter of Excello Press, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Metlife Capital Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- European American Bank v. Sackman Mortgage Corp. (In Re Sackman Mortgage Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- First Bank & Trust Co. v. MitchellNew York Supreme Court · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.