Legal Opinion
James v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 7, 1994No. Civ. 4-93-656PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge. -
This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion for dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, the court grants defendants’ motion.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Stephanie and Roland James purchased a new Ford Escort from Tousley Ford on November 24, 1989. The purchase was financed through defendant Ford Motor Credit Company (“Ford”). Through Ford, plaintiffs also obtained a credit disability insurance policy, issued by Globe Life Insurance. Starting in March 1992, plaintiffs began falling behind in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Duane Montgomery v. Huntington Bank and Silver Shadow Recovery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Marcus v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Seibel v. Society Lease, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1997
- Harrison v. NBD INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Williamson v. Fowler Toyota, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.