Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Hilke
California Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1992No. S025205PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
4 Cal.4th 215 (1992)
841 P.2d 891
14 Cal. Rptr.2d 371
In re the Marriage of JOYCE J. and ROBERT W. HILKE.
JUNE MUELLER, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent,
v.
ROBERT W. HILKE, Appellant.
Docket No. S025205.
Supreme Court of California.
December 17, 1992.
COUNSEL
Henderson & Angle and Robert O. Angle for Appellant.
Robert A. McFarland for Respondent.
OPINION
PANELLI, J.
For the purpose of division of property upon dissolution of marriage, property acquired by the parties during marriage in joint tenancy form is presumed to be community property. (Civ. Code, § 4800.1, subd. (b).)[1] This case requires us to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Marriage of BuolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Tenhet v. BoswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Schindler v. SchindlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2511, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3292 Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Donald Joe Ensley, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Laura L. Ensley, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Kevin Burke Burke Group, Counter-Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Marriage of HeikesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Abbett Electric Corp. v. StorekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance v. EnsleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Frederick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.