Darby v. Southern Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentJustice Stukes
I regret that I am unable to agree with the conclusions and result of the opinion of Mr. Acting Associate Justice Thurmond and feel that I should, at least in part, state my reasons. The result of it will, it seems to me, practically deny to the State, unless and until new legislation be enacted, power to effectively regulate in the public interest, through the Public Service Commission, the intrastate service- of the railroads, although the power and machinery of regulation reasonably protective of the public have long been thought to exist. See Chapter 160 of the Civil Code of 1932, some of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Daniel v. Broad River Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Columbia Gaslight Co. v. Mobley, TreasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Alabama Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- State Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
- City of Columbia v. TatumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.