Legal Opinion

City of Columbia v. Tatum

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 1, 1934No. 13953PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr., Justice Bonham.

The well-considered decree of Judge Mann fully considers and disposes of every issue made by this appeal. Any opinion of this Court must of necessity be merely a duplication of the decree.

It may not be amiss to add that the jurisdiction of the Railroad Commission in the premises is further sustained by the provisions of Section 8248, Volume 3, Code 1932, Act March 6, 1922, 32 St. at Barge, page 956, § 6, to wit:

“Powers as to Public Utilities. — The railroad commission is hereby vested with power and jurisdiction to supervise and…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eldridge v. City of GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Southern Ry. Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  3. Owens v. Owens, MayorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. Utah Light and Traction Co. v. State Tax Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co. v. Kansas City Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API