Legal Opinion

Robert S. Grant Construction, Inc. v. Frontier Bank.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 16, 2011No. 1100565PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOODALL, Justice.

Robert S. Grant Construction, Inc. (“the corporation”), Robert S. Grant (“RSG”), and Pam E. Grant (“PEG”) (the corporation, RSG, and PEG are hereinafter collectively referred to as “the Grants”) appeal from an order striking their jury demands in an action commenced by Frontier Bank (“the bank”) against the Grants and others alleging breach of contract, fraud, and the fraudulent conveyance of real estate. We dismiss the appeal.

This case arises out of a loan from the bank to the corporation. The loan ultimately involved a number of related agreements, including a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vann K. Howard and Kathryn D. Howard v. Parisian, Inc., Etc. Parisian Employees Health Care Plan Hahn Shoe Company Protective Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Grantham v. VanderzylSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Bowdry v. United Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. Poff v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. PabonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Turner v. TurnerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API