Legal Opinion
State v. Pittman
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 8, 1973PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
124 N.J. Super. 334 (1973)
306 A.2d 500
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
NATHANIEL PITTMAN AND MIRIAM PITTMAN, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division (Criminal).
Decided June 8, 1973.
Mr. Robert M. Holland, attorney for defendant Nathaniel Pittman.
Mr. Bruce Edington, attorney for defendant Miriam Pittman.
Mr. Joseph Regan, Assistant Prosecutor, argued for the State (Mr. James M. Coleman, Jr., Monmouth County Prosecutor, attorney).
McGOWAN, A.J.S.C.
Codefendants seek an order dismissing count I of an indictment charging them with conspiracy to make false statements to procure the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. CarboneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- United States v. DegeSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Wolf v. Home Insurance Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Wolf v. the Home Insurance Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Ferraro v. Ferro Trucking Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. StroudCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- State v. InfinitoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Caldwell v. Township of Rochelle ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- State v. MisikNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.