Ford v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
This case centers around a stabbing incident involving three young cousins living in the same household. Appellant, James Ford, was unconstitutionally denied the opportunity to cross-examine one of the witnesses (his cousin Warren Washington) to show bias or, more specifically, motive to lie. We therefore must reverse.
I
Ford lived in the same household with Warren and Reymonte Washington, cousins to each other and to Ford. The stabbing took place in the nighttime in the third-floor bedroom where Warren and Reymonte were sleeping. (Ford normally also slept in that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Pantazes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Elliott v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Gardner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.