Legal Opinion

Ford v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 1988No. 86-1444PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

This case centers around a stabbing incident involving three young cousins living in the same household. Appellant, James Ford, was unconstitutionally denied the opportunity to cross-examine one of the witnesses (his cousin Warren Washington) to show bias or, more specifically, motive to lie. We therefore must reverse.

I

Ford lived in the same household with Warren and Reymonte Washington, cousins to each other and to Ford. The stabbing took place in the nighttime in the third-floor bedroom where Warren and Reymonte were sleeping. (Ford normally also slept in that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Pantazes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Elliott v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Gardner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API