Legal Opinion

In Re Disbarment Proceedings

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 15, 1936No. Appeals, 316, 317, 318 and 321PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Kephart,

These proceedings originated in a letter from the President Judge of Common Pleas No. 2, Philadelphia County, addressed to the Chancellor of the Bar Association. That letter stated that there was a firm and widespread belief that criminal gangs and racketeers regularly employed members of the bar; that they obtained professional advice and guidance from these attorneys in their systematic lawbreaking; and that the actual defendants, gangsters’ agents, are represented by counsel whom they have never seen or heard of until the attorneys appear beside them at…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Snyder's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. In Re Information to Discipline Certain Attorneys of SanitaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  4. In Re the Disbarment of BaileyArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State v. CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. West Virginia State Bar v. EarleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Schlesinger AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Montgomery County Bar Ass'n v. RinalducciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Ginsburg v. SternDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. In Re FranciscusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API