Legal Opinion
Pohlers v. Exeter Manufacturing Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 19, 1944PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lehman, Ch. J.
The defendant is a corporation organized in the State of New Hampshire, authorized by the Secretary of State to do business in the State of New York in accordance with section 210 of the General Corporation Law. The certificate of authority dated the 16th day of January, 1935, certifies that the appellant “ is authorized to do, in this state, the busi ness set forth in the statement and designation, a copy of which is hereto annexed.” The “ statement and designation ” referred to in the certificate was filed by the defendant pursuant to the statute. In it the defendant states…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Gilbert v. BurnstineNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Washington Ex Rel. Bond & Goodwin & Tucker, Inc. v. Superior Court of Wash. for Spokane Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- X-L Liquors, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Beckman v. Greentree Securities, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- David-Zieseniss v. ZiesenissNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- Berner v. United Airlines, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1950
- In re the Arbitration between Samincorp South American Minerals & Merchandise Corp. & Tikvah Mining Co.New York Supreme Court · 1964
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.