Legal Opinion
State v. St. Pierre
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 20, 1997PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Randy St. Pierre appeals from the judgments entered in the Superior Court (Knox County, Atwood, J.) following a jury verdict finding him guilty on two counts of unlawful sexual contact, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255 (Supp.1996). 1 St. Pierre contends that: (1) the trial court erred when it failed to correctly instruct the jury regarding one of the elements of unlawful sexual contact and denied his request for a special verdict form, (2) he was denied a fair trial, and (3) there was insufficient evidence introduced at the trial to sustain his conviction. We disagree and affirm the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. MardenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- State v. SapielSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. TerrioSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SantosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- State v. KlingeHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- State of West Virginia v. Larry A. H.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. PendletonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State of Maine v. Thomas P. WoodardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.