Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Santos

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 31, 2003PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSosman, J.

A jury convicted the defendant of armed robbery, assault by means of a dangerous weapon, and threatening to commit a crime.1 In an unpublished memorandum and order pursuant to its rule 1:28, the Appeals Court affirmed the convictions. Commonwealth v. Santos, 54 Mass. App. Ct. 1116 (2002). We granted the defendant’s application for further appellate review. We now affirm the conviction of armed robbery and vacate the conviction of assault by means of a dangerous weapon.2

1. Facts. Taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, the facts are as follows. On September 23,…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. DelgadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. State v. FrisbySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. MamayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ZanettiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. PorroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  4. United States v. FaustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. AndersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API