Legal Opinion
Putnam v. Davies
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 26, 1996No. C2-95-631PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 10 and 14) and on Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification (Doc. No. 4).
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, on behalf of herself and a class of others similarly situated, to challenge the constitutionality of the “innocent owner” provisions of Ohio R.C. § 4511.195. Section 4511.195 requires law enforcement officers to seize and immobilize the vehicles of persons who have been arrested for a second offense of operating a motor vehicle while…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Coleman v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2004
- Ross v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- Bovee v. Coopers & LybrandDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Thrope v. State of OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.